Besides, it is becoming so tiresome to hear Obama repeat his class warfare rhetoric over, and over, and over again. To all of us level-headed, reasonable conservatives it merely reinforces our growing disdain for a man bent on our destruction. But Barry’s class-envy slowly but surely sinks into the malleable minds of liberals, much like the hate propagated by Adolf’s buddy Joseph Goebbels before and during WWII. If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it!

‘Everyone has to pay their fair share’ is what Barry keeps saying. Listen, Barry…how many times do we have to break this down for you before you can understand it? The top 1% of income earners in 2007 paid 40% of federal income taxes. Moreover, that 40% of federal income taxes paid by the top 1% was more than paid by the bottom 95% combined, according to official IRS data. While the top 1% paid 40% of federal income taxes, the bottom 40% paid no federal income taxes as a group on net. Today 47% pay no federal income taxes. Facts…comin’ at ya, Barry!
Seems to me, if you really want to make it fair, taxes need to be raised (paid) by the 47% who are currently not paying any taxes at all. How about $100 per year, per current non-taxpayer? That would be about $7 billion…not very much.

Ultimately, however, this is not a tax issue. It’s a spending and a jobs issue. It’s a leadership issue. It’s a “too many regulations” issue. We must be unshackled from governmental constraints, and allowed to do what we do best as American innovators and, ultimately, job creators. The American entrepreneurial spirit, suppressed by Obama and his minions for too long, must receive the breath of life which a free market economy can provide as long as government moves out of the way! As long as Barry is kicked out of the way.

Aloha, Barry. Don’t come back.

So here’s the story. This 7-year-old boy is being bullied, choked by another boy on the school bus. In order to defend himself he kicks the bully in the nuts! Well done. Good job. He had it coming. That’s right, this kid should be praised for standing up for himself. This is an important lesson for kids to learn. Instead, this kid is going to learn that standing up for yourself, when you’re the victim, is actually a crime!

Apparently defending yourself against a bully by kicking him in the nuts is now considered “inappropriate touching” and “sexual harassment”. And what do you call choking a kid on the bus?

Where did it all go wrong? Who are the morons who come up with this stuff? These are NOT normal people. They are sick, twisted nut-cases (no offense to the kid with the bruised nuts). How can anyone, with a straight face, accuse this kid of sexual harassment? And to top it all off: the victim is being transferred to another school!

This is truly one of those stories that can make you loose faith in society, in humanity, in the common sense of our neighbors and public officials. The only winners: squirrels. You figure it out!

I suspect the following: the person who decided this was a case of sexual harassment is deeply involved in sadomasochism. Only such an individual would describe the forceful infliction of pain as “sexual”. Now we know where the problem lies: with some sicko school administrator who loves nuts, NOT a 7-year old boy!

Souce: CBS Boston

My Lord, when will they JUST GO AWAY?! I mean, what’s the point? I’m still waiting for them to make an earth-shattering suggestion, for them to offer some pearl of wisdom, anything that will bring this lunacy to an end. What’s it going to take? What do they want? Are there ongoing negotiations? Have these nut bags made any clear, specific demands which we could ponder briefly for our own amusement before we reject them out-of-hand? Aside from these people showing us, in no uncertain terms, that they represent the very sludgy bottom of our American barrel, I would really like them to articulate what it is that would make them vacate our streets and crawl back into their pre-historic caves. The truth is: they don’t know!

They keep chanting “we’re the 99%”. Thankfully that is NOT the case. I truly doubt that 99% of Americans are foul-mouthed, violence-preaching, defecating in public, drug-using, anti-semites who wish to destroy our country as we know it. If that were the case, we’d already be extremely high, covered in shit and dying from tuberculosis.

The truth is that these morons are the fringe of society, those who have failed the test of life and now believe the rest of the world owes them something because they weren’t weaned properly, or their daddies yelled at them, or god knows why!

My advice: get a life, get a job, take some pride in crafting your own destiny, WE DON’T OWE YOU SHIT!

Most families in America, real people, understand this concept. Let’s face it…it’s been tough. My family and I have looked at EVERY aspect of our lives to determine where we can save a few dollars. Every unnecessary subscription or luxury has been eliminated, every utility is used only as absolutely necessary, we have one instead of two cars, we shop at the cheapest supermarkets, and don’t buy the typical “name brand” products.

In short: We cut spending! When you do not have the money that is what you MUST do. Why does Barry refuse to understand a basic economic principle?

What’s really sad about this is that he does understand! He understands that cutting spending will help our country and boost the Republicans in the polls. He understands that when he vetoes these cuts, our country will suffer more and he can take that opportunity to blame Republicans, as usual, and thereby help his reelection campaign.

Barry understands AND he does not care! What could be worse? He cares only about himself and his morally bankrupt ideology. This is the sad truth, people. The sooner you realize that, the more success we will have when the time comes to remove this traitor from office. Obama is the enemy within, make no mistake about it!

Are you kidding me? Aren’t you ALREADY humiliated by carrying all that weight around with you in public…EVERY DAY? How can this experience be any more humiliating for you?

What if you were so fat that only you, Ms. Tiggeman, could fit on the aircraft? Would you still expect only to have to pay for that one seat you booked? Would you still be crying about how the airline humiliated you? YOU ARE REALLY FAT! That’s enough humiliation, don’t you think?

The real question is: where do we draw the line? At which point are you inconsiderate towards your fellow passengers, namely the ones being squeezed, literally, by your girth? What about them? It’s pretty humiliating to have a really fat person on top of you.

An article I read about this “incident” included a comment from a reader:

“I had to fly from Pittsburgh to Florida sitting in the center seat between two obese fools who both spilled over the armrests into my seat. I sat there with my elbows sticking into my sides and my shoulders scrunched in the entire flight. Yes, it was the last available seat. Both of them should have been forced to purchase two seats. I see nothing wrong with the policy.”

Pittsburgh to Florida, ha, sweet deal! You got off easy.

I had a woman overflowing onto me and my seat on a flight from Hamburg, Germany to Los Angeles!! And if that wasn’t bad enough, the BO was so intense my eyes were tearing like I was chopping onions for 13 hours straight.

Hey, at what point should the “mass-challenged” folks HAVE to pay double fare? Well, we measure carry-on bags when we check in, don’t we? There are specific size requirements. If the bag does NOT fit in the over-head, it can’t go on the plane as a carry-on. Perhaps we should have a passenger seat at check-in where those deemed to be “over the limit” can be measured. Those who DO NOT fit, pay extra.

However, if there’s any amount of encroachment, they shouldn’t have to pay extra to the airline. They should have to pay part of the fare to the passenger whose personal space they’re encroaching upon! Of course. THEY are the ones suffering from a total stranger’s self destructive habit. I shouldn’t have to be subjected to and assaulted by your second-hand fat! You’re like a smoker blowing smoke in my face. It’s rude.

If you encroach on 15% of my space, you should have to pay me 20% of my ticket price. Yeah, 15% to match the encroachment amount, and 5% for pain and suffering. That’s fair.

Here’s the very bottom line: have some bloody respect and consideration for others. This is just another case of PC gone crazy. The perpetrator paints herself the victim and gets an apology from Southwest Airlines. This is outrageous!

Ms. Tiggeman, YOU are the culprit here, NOT Southwest! You are selfish and inconsiderate. And of ALL things, you’re a weight-loss blogger! Aaaahhh, the sweet irony!

Second, hell yeah we want to see the pictures of Osama with a huge gaping hole in his head! We watched for hours on end, days, weeks and months, as innocent American civilians leaped to their deaths from the world trade center towers, their only quick escape from certain death. We watched as the towers collapsed, pulverizing everything and everyone within them. The news coverage was relentless, continuous.

Further inflame the Islamic world? Is that supposed to be a joke? Doesn’t the administration realize what they are dealing with here? We just took out their idol, don’t you think THAT will heighten their need to kill all of us?

You can kill him, not kill him, appease the radical Muslims or not, leave the middle east or stay…none of that matters! THEY WANT US DEAD! You could give them EVERYTHING they want, need and ask for, and their number one priority would still be to kill us all. They are FANATICS! They are not governed by reason, logic, good sense or compassion. This gives them something to do with their time. We give them a cause, a purpose in life. Think of how dull their lives would be if we gave in to all of their demands, without a good reason to behead each and everyone of us.

But no, Obama has to feign constraint and consideration, believing it will till temper the fanatics’ resolve. That’s what you get when you send a boy to do a man’s job!

UPDATE:

“It is important to make sure that very graphic photos of somebody who was shot in the head are not floating around as an incitement to additional violence or as a propaganda tool”, said the president.

You sure it’s not out of “respect” for a fellow Muslim, Barry? They don’t need any further incitement. It’s enough for them that we’re Christian Americans (for the most part).

UPDATE:

Now there are actually people who believe Barry is suddenly this great leader, that his approval ratings are making a big turn-around.

Obama is still the same buffoon he has always been, don’t believe the hype! Simply continuing on the path to fight terrorists and find Bin Laden set by his predecessor does not mean Obama is somehow a different man. He has not, based on one decision, suddenly become worthy of praise or support. This one event does not erase the harm he has done to our country and is continuing to do. DO NOT be fooled! You are playing straight into his hands. EVERYTHING he does, every decision he makes is geared towards the next election. If he hadn’t thought this would help him in the polls, he would not have done it. That’s who he is.

If he really wants to be a hero he should allow jobs to be created by lowering taxes, stop spending, eliminate restraints on businesses, and by allowing us to drill for oil wherever it can be found.

All of you who believe Obama is suddenly a great statesman are just sheep, following blindly…and that is precisely what he’s counting on! Baaaahhh!

In the realm of race related ideologies, three stand out: racism, bigotry, and prejudice. To separate the three, I will provide some real world definitions rather than quote a free online dictionary. A racist is one who believes that one race is genetically superior to all other races; a bigot is one who is entirely intolerant of any views other than his/her own; prejudice is a judgment made prior to any action unsupported by any reason.

The moment that someone other than an educated, middle class, white male is involved in a political happening, someone throws down the race card. “This law is racist!” you will hear; “That politician is a racist!” will echo through the legislature; “Racism is alive and well in America!” Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton will proclaim.

What people (and this applies to the right, left, middle, up, down and caddywhompus) need to realize is this: each and every word has a proper meaning, and when that word is bastardized is begins to lose all meaning. In the decades prior to the 14th Amendment, true racism existed and was even institutionalized in many instances. Racism will exist so long as people exist; so long as people have even so much as the slightest difference, hate for that difference will exist.

Leveling the word “racism” against an opponent is the rhetorical equivalent of training a gun on a target. The word has a deep history of strong emotions, and the speaker/shooter is attempting to whore out the history and emotions of the word to his/her advantage. Misusing words in an attempt to induce action is a demonstration of weakness. If a speaker is unable to achieve his/her goal without such misuse, improper application, poor vocabulary, and flat out trickery, then perhaps said individual should pursue a career that doesn’t involve talking so much.

Racism is one of the greatest evils to befall mankind. The belief that one particular human genetic structure is superior to all others is the very thought that claimed six million lives during World War II in addition to those lives lost in the fight. Call the thing what it is; call it hate, call it bigotry, call it prejudice, but do not call it racism unless it is racism. Diluting the word until it has no meaning is an insult to those whom have suffered under its oppression.

According to our insider source, speaking on the condition of anonymity, the administration “sees male urination while standing as a health risk and a filthy habit. Germs are spread in this manner, exposing any number of unsuspecting individuals to potential health hazards”.

Our source indicated that “the requirement for SDU [sitting during urination] is derived from the recently passed health care reform bill. According to the bill, health care can be denied if a male individual can be shown to urinate while standing”. It is still a mystery how to enforce such a law due to the obvious assumption of privacy and the associated difficulty of proving whether a male citizen is urinating while seated or standing.

Apparently this odd law was inspired by Germany. Although not mandated by law in Germany yet, sitting while urinating is quickly becoming the social norm. Standing while urinating is no longer considered PC and many households are not without a sign or sticker above or near the toilets which demands: “Do not urinate while standing!”

Aside from the purported health risks attributed to “urine splatter”, standing while urinating is considered sexist, an attempt by men to elevate themselves over women since they, physiologically, are almost required to sit while urinating. The law is therefore also intended to create a sense of equality among the sexes.

*Legal facts note.

In cases where race is not an issue, racism is alleged. In cases where there’s blatant racism, the offensive gesture is ignored, swept under the carpet.

Those who protest and complain the most about racism in this country, are often the biggest racists among us (and they are overwhelmingly liberal). Everything is backwards, and guess what…minorities are the most racist among us!

Here, I’ll back it up with facts, because those of you who are fuming right about now as you read this are either bleeding-heart liberals (which means you only PRETEND to be outraged about racism), a minority racist or both:

In Oakland, California, a former white transit police officer was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in the shooting death of a young black man.

Aside from the fact that a jury handed down a verdict based on their consideration of the facts of the case, the ONLY thing you need to know at this moment is that the person who did the killing was white and the person who was killed was black. The white man is going to jail, but some are not happy about how long he will be going to jail for. Where should it end? At which point would the punishment be sufficient? Life in prison, the death penalty? The real point is that the presumed white, racist cop needs to fry!

And of course, as always, there is no way the black man is in any way responsible for the incident. White police officers simply pick a random black man and shoot him down in cold blood. That’s the American way, that’s how white folk operate!

I saw the video, I believe the cop must have mistaken his gun for a tazer. How is that possible? I don’t know. Is the cop stupid? Most likely. Did he intend to execute the kid in public? I really doubt it!

OK, so here’s the reaction from minority protesters: looting, vandalism and general chaos! As we all know, that is the absolute best method of voicing our grievances when we feel justice has not been served: committing crimes!

Now, let’s jump to a Philadelphia polling station in November, 2008. Members of the New Black Panther Party were blatantly violating the Voting Rights Act by wearing para-military gear, brandishing night sticks and intimidating white voters who approached, warning them they were “about to be ruled by the black man”.

Where was the outrage about racism in minority communities? Where was the looting, the riots? There were none!

But we can conclude that black on white racism is perfectly alright, perhaps even justified. White on black racism is a felony, an outrage, never excusable, should be punished severely.

Well, this is precisely the message which the Department of Justice is sending by dismissing the blatant, obvious and indisputable case of voter intimidation in Philadelphia.

In one case we have a stupid white cop, in the other blatantly racist black men. These are the hard facts and realities despite the fact that Obama and his fellow racist co-conspirators would have you believe: white bad, black good!

Get real, America!